Need confidence around broken access control?
This is the issue class most likely to expose other users’ data, accounts, and privileged actions.
If you suspect broken access control, the risk is rarely one endpoint alone. The real question is which roles, resources, tenants, and flows can be crossed in practice.
Access-control failures usually depend on real business rules and state transitions, so generic scans rarely prove what another user can actually do or see.
What it usually means
- IDOR or object-level authorization gaps
- Role or tenant boundary failures
- Privileged actions reachable from the wrong user state
What Raijuna would test
- Owner, tenant, and role boundary enforcement
- Multi-step privilege escalation and workflow abuse
- API + UI paths that expose the same access-control weakness in different ways
Use the scoping wizard from this problem page
If this pain point matches what worries your team, the wizard can translate it into the most sensible next engagement before you contact Raijuna.
Answer a few short questions and get a suggested engagement path with the right next step.
Is broken access control the same as IDOR?
IDOR is one common way broken access control appears, but the wider class also includes role mistakes, tenant-isolation failures, and privileged action exposure across workflows.
Can a scanner validate broken access control reliably?
Usually not. Real validation depends on understanding the application’s user states, business rules, and what a user should or should not be allowed to reach.
Scope an access-control review
If this problem is already live in your product or blocking a launch, move into scoping with context attached instead of waiting for a generic review request.
Scope an access-control review