Need confidence around authentication and session security?
Login, reset, session, and recovery flaws often create the shortest path to account takeover.
Authentication risk rarely lives in the login form alone. The real exposure often spans reset flows, token handling, session state, MFA bypass, and trust assumptions between UI and backend paths.
Auth problems often depend on state transitions, email generation, recovery flow logic, or token trust assumptions that generic scanners cannot validate meaningfully.
What it usually means
- Password reset or recovery flow abuse
- Session lifecycle and token-handling weaknesses
- MFA, SSO, or account-state transitions that fail under real edge cases
What Raijuna would test
- Login, reset, MFA, and session transitions end-to-end
- Host-header, token, and session-boundary abuse paths
- How auth flaws chain into privilege escalation or account takeover
Use the scoping wizard from this problem page
If this pain point matches what worries your team, the wizard can translate it into the most sensible next engagement before you contact Raijuna.
Answer a few short questions and get a suggested engagement path with the right next step.
Is this the same as checking password strength?
No. Password policy is only one part of the picture. A real auth review looks at reset logic, token handling, session state, MFA, SSO, and how those pieces fail under real attack paths.
Can an auth review still matter if we use a third-party identity provider?
Yes. Third-party identity reduces some risk, but account linking, session handling, privilege mapping, and recovery logic in your own application can still create serious exposure.
Scope an auth review
If this problem is already live in your product or blocking a launch, move into scoping with context attached instead of waiting for a generic review request.
Scope an auth review