Need a review focused on API authorization risk?
When APIs are the product surface, authorization and token mistakes often become the highest-value exploit path.
API risk is not just about public docs or missing auth. The hardest failures usually live in object-level access control, token scope, backend trust assumptions, and schema exposure.
Many API authorization failures depend on relationship context, state changes, or backend logic that simple endpoint enumeration and auth checks do not capture.
What it usually means
- Object-level authorization gaps across IDs and resources
- Token scope or session-boundary mistakes
- GraphQL or REST exposure that leaks data and action surfaces
What Raijuna would test
- Endpoint and object-level authz checks
- Token lifecycle, scope, and abuse cases
- Schema, resolver, and backend data-flow behavior under real attack paths
Use the scoping wizard from this problem page
If this pain point matches what worries your team, the wizard can translate it into the most sensible next engagement before you contact Raijuna.
Answer a few short questions and get a suggested engagement path with the right next step.
Is API auth the same as login security?
Not exactly. Login is one part of the picture, but API authorization also includes what tokens can do, what data specific users can access, and how backend services trust those identities.
Should API reviews include GraphQL too?
Yes if GraphQL is part of the product. Schema exposure, resolver behavior, and backend trust boundaries can create risks that look different from standard REST endpoints.
Scope an API review
If this problem is already live in your product or blocking a launch, move into scoping with context attached instead of waiting for a generic review request.
Scope an API review